When the Raphael article discussed why Book Clubs are so integral to student learning, I was skeptical at first. I wasn't convinced that teacher's couldn't employ a different strategy that would benefit the students in a similar way. I then read, "language use is fundamental to thinking." I could not think of any other way than a Book Club that really made use of discussions as a way of learning in literacy instruction. Of course I have seen discussions as a class where the teacher calls it a discussion, but it really becomes a question and answer session with students answering the teacher's questions. Book Club, however, turns the discussion into a rich and meaningful experience which promotes student learning.
Raphael claims that Book Club was designed to "incorporate skills and strategies associated with reading acquisition and critical thinking required for living in and contributing to a democratic society." While I personally think that statement is hokey and built to sound impressive, I also feel that it is based on valid principles. Utilizing strategies like Book Club allows for meaningful discussion that is not pretentious or of poor quality. It allows for students to become invested in their literature, and really places the emphasis on the literature and not the questions. I love the idea of students enjoying and choosing to participate in something like Book Club, because it allows me to know as a teacher the student is invested and interested, not bored and only involved because they must.
I think you said some very rewarding points in this post! I agree with you that Book Club enriches discussion. It keeps all of the students on the same page. Would it work to give different students different "jobs" in the book club (facilitator, summary, characters..)? Maybe this would give the students something to focus on when they're reading. Or do you think that it would take away from the overall reading of the book?
ReplyDelete